Closed dt9640214 closed 1 year ago
Hi! Could you share your experimental categories and your training parameters? I could help to check it.
抱歉,我发现可能是我在做其他测试的时候不小心改到程式码 我用重新下载的程式码跑之后数据正常了 不过我想确认程式中的: i_roc对应期刊中的AU-ROC p_roc没有对应 p_pro对应期刊中的AU-PRO 这样理解对吗?
谢谢
I would clarify that p_roc denotes to pixel-level au-roc and p_pro denotes to pixel-level au-pro. Hope this helps!
I used the parameters you provided to train MVTec2D and the i_roc I got is enough high, but the p_roc and p_pro are about 80 and 60 (according to different categories, some are even only 40 and 20) and p_pro represents the AU-PRO you announced ? Or can AU-PRO get in other ways?