Closed ecc521 closed 1 year ago
Don't love this formatting
Neither do I. Apart from that, it is not a requirement so far that the name should be unique.
The property description is: Human-readable name that represents the voice.
This is currently given.
If you really want a unique name, you can append the property voiceURI
to the property name
by yourself. The other way round is more difficult. Apart from that, this would be a breaking change. I know of two companies that display this name to their users.
For this reason, I am closing this issue for now.
Expand the name property - this ensures that Android voice packages should have distinctly different names when shown to users. (close #95)
Don't love this formatting, so interested in alternative ideas as for ensuring voice names are unique but user friendly.