Open gregcaporaso opened 8 years ago
From @wdwvt1 on February 15, 2016 8:15
Will check in to using click
for this. Should be straightforward given that the number of samples is known and each iteration of Gibbs is independent.
For methods that are not Gibb's this might be harder, but we will investigate those as we come to it.
From @lkursell on February 15, 2016 16:24
The thing I counted on most from the verbose ST was to make sure that my sinks and sources were properly defined, and were running as I intended. But it also helped me gauge speed to know if some rarefaction level was just never going to work out.
On Feb 15, 2016, at 12:15 AM, Will Van Treuren notifications@github.com wrote:
Will check in to using click for this. Should be straightforward given that the number of samples is known and each iteration of Gibbs is independent.
For methods that are not Gibb's this might be harder, but we will investigate those as we come to it.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/biota/sourcetracker2/issues/14#issuecomment-184107722.
From @lkursell on February 12, 2016 22:39
Displaying ST2's progress, like the original, is very helpful for making sure commands are getting executed correctly, especially given the time required for jobs to finish. And they are a very convenient way for determining progress.
_Copied from original issue: biota/sourcetracker2internal#14