It's not really a bug but more like a tech-debt that after PR #1306, all registers in operands are considered as in the same family SYSZ_OP_REG even for the Access Registers. This fact makes the existence of SYSZ_OP_ACREG confusing. One may check the operands against SYSZ_OP_ACREG but it would never match.
From cstool on v4, d7e459d026b19d6c3a7b743bfc475d919ff03f74
It's not really a bug but more like a tech-debt that after PR #1306, all registers in operands are considered as in the same family
SYSZ_OP_REG
even for the Access Registers. This fact makes the existence ofSYSZ_OP_ACREG
confusing. One may check the operands againstSYSZ_OP_ACREG
but it would never match.From cstool on v4, d7e459d026b19d6c3a7b743bfc475d919ff03f74
on v5, 7905571be70b20574331fe25131ad923d64745ab:
To address this issue the macro
SYSZ_OP_ACREG
should be remove to prevent confusions.