What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. A does a FT to B
2. B accepts
3. B cancels before the end of transfer
What is the expected output?
A receives information that B cancels the FT (handle Terminated)
What do you see instead?
A receives handle error after this handle terminated
Additional information.
When B cancels the FT, it sends SIP BYE and close the MSRP session.
The close of MSRP is faster than the SIP BYE.
Then A can't send the next MSRP chunk and handle a MSRP error, then send SIP
BYE and handle error to the application. In parallel, A receives SIP BYE and
handle terminated...
Original issue reported on code.google.com by benoit.j...@gmail.com on 16 Jan 2014 at 4:08
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
benoit.j...@gmail.com
on 16 Jan 2014 at 4:08