Open AndBerna opened 7 months ago
I think I'd prefer the unit to be at the top level, it makes it much easier to ingest the data if all of it is coming with the same unit on each call.
I think I'd prefer the unit to be at the top level, it makes it much easier to ingest the data if all of it is coming with the same unit on each call.
in terms of readiblity I totally agree with you, but I was worried on how to manage it in PSRs that represent balancing areas where we can have varying magnitudes from nuclear power plants to local solar farms, for instance
Maybe we just default to MWh? Most solar farms would be on the order of magnitude of 1 MWh, and a nuclear plant would only be in the thousands then right?
This PR solves the problem stated at #98
Proposed solution for PSR Capacity
New response object proposed :
fuelSource
: A list of the different fuel sourcesunit
is now individual for eachfuelSource
: Different generating plants might have different magnitudes.capacity
for eachFuelSource
: Historical updates are clearly identified with their correspondingfuelSource
.i.e: The proposed example shows two producing units:
Proposed update for PSR Transmission Capacity
unit
should be individual for eachtransmissionCapacity
: Different interconnections might have different magnitudes.