Closed maryjiang-ibm closed 3 years ago
Feel free to join design reviews and huddles if you d like some eyes on any WIP!
Playing devils advocate 😈
Great questions!
Why did legal request 3 buttons (accept all, proceed with required, manage settings)? Could we replace the "Proceed with required" secondary action with "Manage settings"? To visitors, the distinction between accepting all vs. required cookies is likely fuzzy.
IBM is trying to be ethical here. By having "Accept required" or "proceed with required", we expose the option of NOT tracking the visitor. Usually sites more concerned with selling you things will hide this button so people will just push "Accept all" and consent to being tracked, and become target for ads.
cookies-explorations-june2020.zip
Sketch file of first two explorations and screenshots of cookie consent experiences on other sites.
Objective
Create additional design explorations for IBM.com cookie preferences, building upon the ongoing redesign by the Commons team. This is a learning exercise to familiarize DGC interns with the dotcom design system.
Tasks
Acceptance criteria
Additional Information
Design spec: cookie_notes_from_shixie.txt
Existing designs: component--cookies--visual-spec.sketch.zip
[Current experience on IBM.com] Screen 1 - Personalize preferences
[Current experience on IBM.com] Screen 2 - Personalize preferences (ft. advanced settings)