Open gribozavr opened 3 years ago
Note, "Should there be a function type? #191" may supersede this issue.
This issue with repeated fnty a good observation. Certainly a disadvantage of the current syntax.
We triage inactive PRs and issues in order to make it easier to find active work. If this issue should remain active or becomes active again, please comment or remove the inactive
label. The long term
label can also be added for issues which are expected to take time.
This issue is labeled inactive
because the last activity was over 90 days ago.
According to the grammar in the basic syntax proposal (#162) it seems like curried function types require repeating the
fnty
keyword:For example:
I understand why it happens, and I see that it is uniform with regards to the
expression
production, but the result -- repeated fnty keywords -- does not seem aesthetically pleasing to me.