So, I noticed that ImportIRInst didn't print properly while trying to debug an issue, and that's where this started. Then I was sort of trying to figure out why we have "type_blocks" but "typeBlock", so trying to make that more consistent. "importIRInst0" felt more odd than "import_ir_inst0" which is why I'm suggesting down this particular route, but let me know if you'd prefer the reverse (but then do we also do "typeBlocks", etc, removing the consistency with the member name?)
Also starting to print more detail on import_irs, and added import_ir_insts (adjusting formatting for that too).
So, I noticed that ImportIRInst didn't print properly while trying to debug an issue, and that's where this started. Then I was sort of trying to figure out why we have "type_blocks" but "typeBlock", so trying to make that more consistent. "importIRInst0" felt more odd than "import_ir_inst0" which is why I'm suggesting down this particular route, but let me know if you'd prefer the reverse (but then do we also do "typeBlocks", etc, removing the consistency with the member name?)
Also starting to print more detail on import_irs, and added import_ir_insts (adjusting formatting for that too).