Closed noonio closed 1 week ago
No cost or size differences found
Hmm, seems like tasty-bench doesn't support the HTML output option; so will need to see if there's a quick fix for that.
5 files ±0 162 suites ±0 28m 3s ⏱️ - 4m 7s 554 tests ±0 548 ✅ ±0 6 💤 ±0 0 ❌ ±0 556 runs ±0 550 ✅ ±0 6 💤 ±0 0 ❌ ±0
Results for commit 41fb994c. ± Comparison against base commit 3be7b22a.
:recycle: This comment has been updated with latest results.
Running the benchmarks like so:
N_TXNS=1000000 cabal bench micro --benchmark-options '--json output.json +RTS -T'
Supposing you get peakMbAllocated
from this:
jq '.[2][0].reportKeys[5]' hydra-node/output.json
You can find the mb this way:
jq '.[2][0].reportMeasured[0][5]' hydra-node/output.json
(Exercise for someone to do this properly for the JSON output.)
Sizes and execution budgets for Hydra protocol transactions. Note that unlisted parameters are currently using arbitrary
values and results are not fully deterministic and comparable to previous runs.
Metadata | |
---|---|
Generated at | 2024-11-13 13:45:59.043412945 UTC |
Max. memory units | 14000000 |
Max. CPU units | 10000000000 |
Max. tx size (kB) | 16384 |
Name | Hash | Size (Bytes) |
---|---|---|
νInitial | 00a6ddbc130ab92f5b7cb8d1ccd8d79eca5bfe25f6843c07b62841f0 | 2667 |
νCommit | 3e5a776bcee213e3dfd15806952a10ac5590e3e97d09d62eb99266b2 | 690 |
νHead | 00e0e6aceb51fcb4fcc5dc6032cc524a641163f0723b25d995de3ae8 | 12633 |
μHead | 134f18365d53de72b07af2e703c96d8a6f0643c71d4c1a2050b8182a* | 11111 |
νDeposit | 2feb47889a4f658dc593cefcb0e37d584b9431944f08a687f3dab4af | 4865 |
Init
transaction costsParties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 11700 | 8.83 | 2.88 | 0.76 |
2 | 11896 | 10.76 | 3.52 | 0.79 |
3 | 12097 | 12.83 | 4.21 | 0.82 |
5 | 12500 | 15.89 | 5.17 | 0.87 |
10 | 13503 | 24.65 | 8.02 | 1.00 |
24 | 16322 | 49.59 | 16.14 | 1.39 |
Commit
transaction costsThis uses ada-only outputs for better comparability.
UTxO | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 561 | 2.45 | 1.17 | 0.20 |
2 | 743 | 3.40 | 1.74 | 0.22 |
3 | 917 | 4.39 | 2.34 | 0.24 |
5 | 1274 | 6.46 | 3.61 | 0.28 |
10 | 2180 | 12.24 | 7.28 | 0.40 |
54 | 10063 | 99.20 | 68.72 | 1.89 |
CollectCom
transaction costsParties | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 57 | 560 | 24.69 | 7.19 | 0.43 |
2 | 114 | 671 | 32.74 | 9.53 | 0.51 |
3 | 170 | 786 | 40.68 | 11.83 | 0.60 |
4 | 227 | 893 | 51.48 | 14.81 | 0.71 |
5 | 283 | 1004 | 62.90 | 17.95 | 0.83 |
6 | 340 | 1116 | 63.48 | 18.49 | 0.85 |
7 | 395 | 1227 | 73.24 | 21.27 | 0.95 |
8 | 451 | 1338 | 85.09 | 24.42 | 1.07 |
9 | 505 | 1449 | 87.27 | 25.45 | 1.10 |
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 654 | 22.26 | 7.22 | 0.41 |
2 | 771 | 23.99 | 8.36 | 0.44 |
3 | 914 | 24.67 | 9.20 | 0.46 |
5 | 1248 | 28.77 | 11.68 | 0.52 |
10 | 1911 | 36.87 | 17.31 | 0.66 |
41 | 6783 | 99.53 | 55.53 | 1.65 |
Close
transaction costsParties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 668 | 24.31 | 8.01 | 0.43 |
2 | 819 | 26.44 | 9.44 | 0.47 |
3 | 1036 | 28.61 | 10.90 | 0.51 |
5 | 1286 | 31.60 | 13.19 | 0.56 |
10 | 1998 | 39.80 | 19.23 | 0.70 |
44 | 7062 | 99.33 | 61.92 | 1.71 |
Contest
transaction costsParties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 688 | 30.32 | 9.61 | 0.49 |
2 | 815 | 32.17 | 10.85 | 0.52 |
3 | 900 | 33.42 | 11.80 | 0.54 |
5 | 1344 | 38.85 | 15.13 | 0.63 |
10 | 1927 | 47.73 | 21.14 | 0.77 |
34 | 5529 | 97.00 | 53.20 | 1.56 |
Abort
transaction costsThere is some variation due to the random mixture of initial and already committed outputs.
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 11575 | 25.80 | 8.76 | 0.93 |
2 | 11708 | 34.12 | 11.62 | 1.02 |
3 | 11861 | 43.69 | 14.91 | 1.13 |
4 | 12013 | 52.44 | 17.86 | 1.23 |
5 | 12035 | 56.15 | 19.08 | 1.27 |
6 | 12317 | 71.23 | 24.34 | 1.44 |
7 | 12431 | 79.38 | 27.06 | 1.53 |
8 | 12405 | 83.59 | 28.31 | 1.58 |
9 | 12525 | 87.13 | 29.54 | 1.62 |
10 | 12712 | 95.88 | 32.70 | 1.72 |
FanOut
transaction costsInvolves spending head output and burning head tokens. Uses ada-only UTXO for better comparability.
Parties | UTxO | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 | 0 | 0 | 11692 | 17.34 | 5.93 | 0.85 |
10 | 1 | 57 | 11727 | 19.19 | 6.70 | 0.87 |
10 | 5 | 285 | 11862 | 27.49 | 10.07 | 0.97 |
10 | 10 | 570 | 12032 | 35.13 | 13.28 | 1.06 |
10 | 20 | 1139 | 12371 | 54.02 | 21.03 | 1.28 |
10 | 30 | 1704 | 12708 | 73.27 | 28.92 | 1.51 |
10 | 40 | 2273 | 13047 | 91.81 | 36.54 | 1.73 |
10 | 44 | 2505 | 13187 | 98.49 | 39.32 | 1.81 |
This page is intended to collect the latest end-to-end benchmark results produced by Hydra's continuous integration (CI) system from the latest master
code.
Please note that these results are approximate as they are currently produced from limited cloud VMs and not controlled hardware. Rather than focusing on the absolute results, the emphasis should be on relative results, such as how the timings for a scenario evolve as the code changes.
Generated at 2024-11-13 13:49:05.436458294 UTC
Number of nodes | 1 |
---|---|
Number of txs | 300 |
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) | 4.725672723 |
P99 | 7.645229199999999ms |
P95 | 6.0821347999999995ms |
P50 | 4.552252ms |
Number of Invalid txs | 0 |
Number of nodes | 3 |
---|---|
Number of txs | 900 |
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) | 24.767187944 |
P99 | 114.54338578999996ms |
P95 | 34.76249535ms |
P50 | 22.1581765ms |
Number of Invalid txs | 0 |
Fixes #1724
This slightly modifies the micro benchmark to hake a configurable number of transactions to run for, and shows how to use it to get memory usage output.