Closed guozixunnicolas closed 5 years ago
After running test_lanenet.py, you get the probability maps from the model. To get the final performance, you just need to follow instructions in SCNN-Torch. More specifically, follow step 3 and 4 (i.e., get curve line from probability map and calculate precision, recall, and F-measure) in the testing phase.
Thank you! it works now:)
The evaluation for CULane is quite slow. It takes tens of minutes or even an hour to finish all the evaluation (9 different test list). I wanna check if this is normal.
It is normal since there are 30k images in the testing set.
@cardwing Thanks! Pardon me for inquiring the details. May I ask what parameters do you use for evaluation for CULane? Do you use the default setup that width_lane: 30
and iou_threshold: 0.5
?
Yes. You can just check the details in scripts of ENet-Label-Torch. The performance of the released model (F1-measure: 72.0) is higher than the reported value (F1-measure: 70.8).
Hi,
May i know do you have the evaluation script in Python?
Could you please share it?
Best,
ZX