Closed garryz94 closed 4 years ago
If you remove the exist loss, you may not use the F1-measure as the evaluation criterion since it needs to differentiate each lane instance (or you can use the clustering module to help differentiate lane instances). And I think the removal of exist loss won't greatly affect the pixel-level accuracy. You can have a try.
If you remove the exist loss, you may not use the F1-measure as the evaluation criterion since it needs to differentiate each lane instance (or you can use the clustering module to help differentiate lane instances). And I think the removal of exist loss won't greatly affect the pixel-level accuracy. You can have a try.
Thanks for your quick reply! I will try it. Different from CULane and TuSimple, my own data only have semantic-segmentation-style ground truth. In other words, when some obstacles occludes the lane line or when it comes to dash-style lane line , the imaginary lane is not labelled which is different from the above lane detection dataset. So should I do something to preprocess my data?
You just need to check the size of your input images and make sure that data augmentation is rational.
You just need to check the size of your input images and make sure that data augmentation is rational.
In this way, SAD will act more like a semantic segmentation algorithm than a lane detection model? Am I right?
Yes.
Yes.
Thanks for your reply.
Hi @cardwing , first I want to thank you for sharing your excellent work, it really helps! I want to train erfnet-sad on my own data, but the number of lanes in my custom data varies a lot. So clearly, I don't have exist_file for my own data and it is hardly possible for me to calculate it. So what will happen when I remove the exist loss from the network?