Open cool-RR opened 10 years ago
You mean Money.to(self, currency, _args, *_kwargs) and passing them to quotation() right? Agreed we need that for more flexibility.
Yes. Only caveat with that is that it precludes you from adding arguments to that method in the future. It might be worth it though.
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 12:25 AM, Carlos Palol notifications@github.com wrote:
You mean Money.to(self, currency, _args, *_kwargs) and passing them to quotation() right? Agreed we need that for more flexibility.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/carlospalol/money/issues/7#issuecomment-54728862.
Well, at least new "official" arguments could be added (as kwargs exclusively). In any other scenario, sending new positional arguments would break existing custom backends anyway.
Probably even better to close down positional args altogether, also for custom backends: Money.to(self, currency, **kwargs)
and BackendBase.quotation(self, origin, target, **kwargs)
.
I agree that blocking positional arguments is better.
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 2:53 AM, Carlos Palol notifications@github.com wrote:
Well, at least new "official" arguments could be added (as kwargs exclusively). In any other scenario, sending new positional arguments would break existing custom backends anyway.
Probably even better to close down positional args altogether, also for custom backends: Money.to(self, currency, _kwargs) and BackendBase.quotation(self, origin, target, _kwargs).
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/carlospalol/money/issues/7#issuecomment-54732444.
I want to write an app which converts currencies according to the exchange rate on that day. I wish the exchange API would allow a datetime on the conversion call. Also, making it open for arbitrary arguments might be a good idea, because other people might have other needs. (e.g. if someone uses different exchange providers who have different rates, they might want to pass the exchange provider to get the correct rate for it.)