Open nschneid opened 4 years ago
stimulus to which an entity has a particular kind of (non)reaction: (someone is) cool/sympathetic/alert/allergic/sensitive/blind/immune/inured TO (stimulus)
- cf. react TO
The best we can think of is Stimulus~>Theme.
The name has a nice ring TO it. There's something/nothing TO it. (idiom)
there is a nice texture to the oil painting the guide to the museum the blueprints to the site rules to the game a method to his madness party to privy to winner to the game: "I am declaring a winner to the game.", "We don't have a winner to the game"
"Meth though messes people up big time, so I don't see a lot of upside to that." AMR calls this :topic
.
some thoughts:
some thoughts:
there is a nice texture to the oil painting (Characteristic, =the oil painting's texture is nice, the oil painting has a nice texture)
rules to the game (Characteristic?, =the game's rules, the game has rules, but what about "rules for playing the game"? that's Purpose?)
I don't see a lot of upside to that (Characteristic, that has a lot of upside, its upside)
Do you mean Gestalt for these?
Note that "answer/response TO a question" is Topic~Goal in the guidelines. It seems to be a blend of the information-content meaning present in some of these examples (e.g. guide to a museum), the way-to-access-or-figure-something-out (e.g. key to the door), and paired-with correspondence (question and answer are paired). You can say "the question has an answer" but it's not as direct a property as some of the others.
Thought about this some more. Attempting a fine-grained approach (WIP):
https://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/328511/if-we-put-of-instead-of-to-in-the-example-sentences mentions "key to the door", "ambassador to France"
https://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/331972/start-to-the-week-vs-start-of-the-week "start to/of the week"
For the property ones, I have a vague feeling that "of" vs. "to" involves a difference in construal along the lines of perceptual scanning or figure/ground...."to" suggests you are noticing a salient detail, whereas "of" is more neutral. Maybe information structure too?
"To" almost suggests an experiential journey, rather than just a point or period in time.
https://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/331972/start-to-the-week-vs-start-of-the-week "start to/of the week"
SO i remember from my Syntax 101 that the 'of' clause is considered a complement to the noun and it was the exception. Other PPs were considered adjuncts to the noun. I also remember that I felt like some SNACS labels were more correlated to adjunct phrases than to complements (like Circumstance and Manner, just examples..)
TPP 10(4a) has many miscellaneous selected senses of TO: FN query, TPP/CPA query
Adj governor
entity/group argument to an adjective describing how a property applies: "differences are common TO all predators", inherent/intrinsic/endemic/native/specific/essential/fundamental TO (#42: Theme~>Theme)
with Adj denoting the propensity of an entity toward a possible outcome: liable/prone/given TO (behavior or outcome) - expectation about the future
stimulus to which an entity has a particular kind of (non)reaction: (someone is) cool/sympathetic/alert/allergic/sensitive/blind/immune/inured/vulnerable TO (stimulus)
with a force-dynamic Adj: opposed/resistant/subservient/subject/indebted/loyal TO
"some points were important TO the smooth running of Cabinet machinery"
appropriate/suited/applicable TO
related TO
confined/limited TO (#15)
previous/prior/subsequent TO
(someone is) new TO (experience)
detrimental/destructive TO (Theme, cf. damage TO)
Noun governor
(apart from derived nouns listed above)
Verb governor