accompanied WITH / go WITH

[esmanning]

Must be accompanied WITH an Erdinger Weißbier [Context: recommending a specific Bavarian pork dish] task_008 new_doc id = 65ff6adc-41ae-f3f7-0010-98240a614be3 sent_id = 5

And

some would rather just go to a foreign country and actually see and meet foreign people and the different cultures/sights that go WITH it than... task_009 new_doc id = a1645f58-bb78-eb2d-0ee5-144d8a1d8b42 sent_id = 2

Both of these were previously annotated Accompanier but less clear under 2.5

[nschneid]

Verbal reifications of SNACS relations are hard.

Ensemble~>Ancillary, maybe? If we take "accompany" as marking a static relation between two entities.

[nschneid]

Must be accompanied WITH an Erdinger Weißbier

some would rather just go to a foreign country and actually see and meet foreign people and the different cultures/sights that go WITH it

Simplified:

"Some want to meet people/sights that go WITH a foreign country."

Reading a) people/sights are part of the foreign country, so scene role = Gestalt. This is the deeper reading. Reading b) two items go together: if you get one, you get the other automatically. so just accompaniment

We like reading (b) for annotating the preposition.

[jenahwang]

"visiting foreign country comes WITH it meeting people/seeing sights"

[nschneid]

Ensemble~>Ancillary