the default implementations of some string functions can consume a lot of clock cycles, e.g. for large arrays which call the prn implementation for each member, yielding some function call overhead. I think (but I'm not certain)that calling printf directly on members would probably be at least a little more efficient: printf("%d" arr[i]) in the for body opposed to prn(arr[i]).
maybe we could tackle this similarly to blit? if there's an interface a type implements perhaps we can perform some optimization where we inline the printf call or something
the default implementations of some string functions can consume a lot of clock cycles, e.g. for large arrays which call the prn implementation for each member, yielding some function call overhead. I think (but I'm not certain)that calling printf directly on members would probably be at least a little more efficient:
printf("%d" arr[i])in the for body opposed toprn(arr[i]).maybe we could tackle this similarly to
blit? if there's an interface a type implements perhaps we can perform some optimization where we inline the printf call or something