Open SamuelMcEwan opened 1 year ago
Thank you very much for flagging this, and I apologize for the delay in getting back to you. We are getting ready to do some updates/improvements soon (hopefully) and will look at this as soon as we can.
Thank you for your interest in our package!
Hello, I recently QC'd longitudinal growth data and made an interesting observation. Despite setting the 'height.tolerance.cm' parameter to 1, Growthcleanr did not flag sequential height drops > 1.5cm.
Here is a reproducible example: I have simulated data in which a subsequent height measurement drops by 1.5cm.
Generate Data
Create a spurious datapoint
Impose loose & strict QC
Results
The datapoint d[10,] is not flagged by a strict QC process where height.tolerance.cm=1
This seems unintended, and I'd appreciate some help or just spreading the word. Sorry if I have misinterpreted the functionalities of growthcleanr.
Kind regards