Closed ffreyer closed 3 years ago
In relation to #78.
In isolated benchmarks with real 64x64 martices, rdivp! takes 8-9µs. The old method took 61-69µs and should cause GC to trigger more frequently. rdivp! may also be more accurate, as we avoid an extra lu decomposition and explicit inversion.
rdivp!
lu
In relation to #78.
In isolated benchmarks with real 64x64 martices,
rdivp!takes 8-9µs. The old method took 61-69µs and should cause GC to trigger more frequently.rdivp!may also be more accurate, as we avoid an extraludecomposition and explicit inversion.