codecov-commenter
commented
1 year ago Codecov Report
Patch and project coverage have no change.
Comparison is base (
e8cb320) 81.79% compared to head (5fea841) 81.79%.
:mega: This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #426 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 81.79% 81.79% ======================================= Files 80 80 Lines 4718 4718 Branches 685 685 ======================================= Hits 3859 3859 Misses 657 657 Partials 202 202 ``` | Flag | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | unittests | `81.79% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=None#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=None). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=None):umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
Revised the documentation site to mention the webinar instead Using new dataset,
clrd, and new blanks to fill in