codecov[bot]
commented
10 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
633d730) 81.91% compared to head (5ef434b) 81.91%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #488 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 81.91% 81.91% ======================================= Files 80 80 Lines 4706 4706 Branches 807 807 ======================================= Hits 3855 3855 Misses 648 648 Partials 203 203 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/casact/chainladder-python/pull/488/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=casact) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/casact/chainladder-python/pull/488/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=casact) | `81.91% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=casact#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
jbogaardt
I couldn't figure out where
/auto_examples/images/sphx_glr_plot_capecod_001.pngis supposed to be in the repo, but that link is broken so I added a TODOedit: not sure what is up with the diff on the triangle.ipynb, seems to be a formatting difference. editing in codespaces so maybe like a different version of vscode than previously used idk.