Closed ErikUniformAgri closed 2 years ago
@jkour plz review
Hi again,
Can you please explain what is the need for this?
Can a test show the difference?
I have added an testcase which gives an error in the original code, but does not in the new code. I only expected a Deny, but it gets accepted somehow. Do you know why? And if thats correct?
@jkour
Hi, The RegExpression you added does not replace all the instances of the pair.key. It replaces only the first instance.
Actually, the pattern grabs the xxxx= but not the =xxx. You write it your comments
All identifiers are replaced now. As far as I can see the pattern grabs the right part in the string.
Great. This looks good. Thx
See example in code