Open casey opened 4 years ago
Using fixup! is not ideal, because when squashing with fixup!, git expects the rest of the commit summary after fixup! to match a previous commit.
fixup!
Ideally:
It should be easy for contributors to mark a change as not needing a changelog entry.
It should be hard for me to accidentally merge commits which don't have changelog entries, since those commits should be squashed .
Using
fixup!is not ideal, because when squashing withfixup!, git expects the rest of the commit summary afterfixup!to match a previous commit.Ideally:
It should be easy for contributors to mark a change as not needing a changelog entry.
It should be hard for me to accidentally merge commits which don't have changelog entries, since those commits should be squashed .