castleproject-deprecated / ActiveRecord

Other
102 stars 67 forks source link

Upgraded Castle ActiveRecord's NHibernate to 3.3.1.4000 #2

Open justintoth opened 12 years ago

justintoth commented 12 years ago

Not sure of the implications of this upgrade, but I was able to get the AR source compiling with the latest version of NHibernate. Everything seems to run fine in my applications with the upgraded version, however needless to say, I'm not using every single feature in AR.

Note: Someone should probably rip out the references to NHibernate.ByteCode.Castle in AR, as it is obsolete as of NHibernate 3.2.

Daniel15 commented 11 years ago

Have you encountered any issues with this so far, or is it all working as expected?

justintoth commented 11 years ago

I ran into issues and then read that ar is no longer supported so stopped dev.

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 14, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Daniel Lo Nigro notifications@github.com wrote:

Have you encountered any issues with this so far, or is it all working as expected?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

Daniel15 commented 11 years ago

Fair enough. Did you migrate your application to another library (like Fluent NHibernate or just "raw" NHibernate)?

justintoth commented 11 years ago

Personally I'm still using Active Record (I'm just not putting effort into upgrading its source code.) I still love the clean/easy approach of AR and I can always call sprocs from it if it doesn't do something that I need. If you don't need new SQL Server 2008 features like the geography type then you can get away with still using it, and that's coming from a developer who is always staying on the bleeding edge of technology. However, I believe the "correct" answer these days would be to use Fluent NHibernate.

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Daniel Lo Nigro notifications@github.comwrote:

Fair enough. Did you migrate your application to another library (like Fluent NHibernate or just "raw" NHibernate)?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/castleproject/ActiveRecord/pull/2#issuecomment-10397404.