Closed zaneselvans closed 4 years ago
In terms of units of overall heat content, it turns out the points at 0.1 mmBTU/mcf are much more important than the larger number of records (with very little heat content) at 0.5 mmBTU/mcf, and they show up across the frc_eia923
and bf_eia923
tables as well But also since one of the two columns involved is probably the one with the errors in it... who knows which one is more important in reality. Further investigation of the original data required
Duplicate/subsumed within #391
Describe the bug
If you create a
PudlTabl
output object withfreq="MS"
and then use it to generate agf_eia923
output dataframe, some of the values offuel_mmbtu_per_unit
are wrong. In particular, for records pertaining to natural gas, a significant fraction of them have values of about 0.5 instead of 1.0 -- it seems like they've been cut in half accidentally by the aggregation process.Bug Severity
High: This is clearly just... wrong -- we're outputting bad data.
To Reproduce
Expected behavior
The distribution of aggregated fuel heat content should be very similar to that of the original data -- in this case for natural gas, it should be unimodal with a median value just a little bit above 1.0 mmBTU/mcf.