Closed CodyCBakerPhD closed 11 months ago
Well, turns out there is huge variability/heterogeneity on this one
and JSON dump of stripped references: https://github.com/catalystneuro/visual-coding-to-nwb-v2/blob/main/src/visual_coding_to_nwb_v2/visual_coding_ophys/scripts/stripped_experiment_names.json
Most items belong to one of three groups 3Stim{A or B or C2}
but even then they are variations in capitalization, misspelling, or disarrangement
Whereas the session_type
is much more stable but still some variation for the 'C' group
After more experience with this dataset I can safely say that all of the information contained in the variability of the ophys_experiment_name
is captured by other more structured and reliable fields across the file contents
From http://help.brain-map.org/display/observatory/Data+-+Visual+Coding, we can conclude that the session_type
is reliable for this and will be included in the session ID for easier human readability
So many custom fields on the outer metadata...
For the prototype file
571099190.nwb
general.session_type = three_session_B
and
general.ophys_experiment_name = 20170224_283278_3StimB