Closed kakenbok closed 3 years ago
It's allowed with no limitation on c5cda0f, and will be available on the next v2.0 soon.
But you have to take care query if using it without GROUP BY for the case with aggregate function executed.
Here is a cat for you: https://giphy.com/gifs/TikTokItalia-carino-gattino-sternuto-Q7jvImsNUcdzuGRtLd
Thank you!
Describe the bug Currently, a GROUP field is required for applying a having clause. However, according to some obscure websites like: https://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/57445/use-of-having-without-group-by-in-sql-queries/57453 this is not required and bloats the code a litte bit.
Information
Detail Code I may workaround the GROUP requirement by subclassing
Medoo
- but I don't like this approach, it's you great class, and I don't want to supersede or mess your work and thoughts ;-)Thanks for considering :-)