search

catppuccin / gtk

🪟 Soothing pastel theme for GTK3/4
GNU General Public License v3.0
913 stars 54 forks source link

chore: issue template #222

Closed nullishamy closed 6 months ago

nullishamy commented 6 months ago

Closes #189

nullishamy commented 6 months ago

Once #221 lands, we should add a question similar to the GTK4 one that asks if the user has run the Flatpak commands. Blocked on this change being merged.

isabelroses commented 6 months ago

ctp/nix is just a wrapper around the nixpkgs package. could it be listed in a different way perhaps?

nullishamy commented 6 months ago

I think it makes sense to distinguish them. There may be a problem (potentially induced by us) that one or the other hasn't fixed / update to, would make narrowing it down easier, I think.

isabelroses commented 6 months ago

I think it makes sense to distinguish them. There may be a problem (potentially induced by us) that one or the other hasn't fixed / update to, would make narrowing it down easier, I think.

ctp/nix just calls the nixpkg so they should always be on the same version.

nullishamy commented 6 months ago

ctp/nix just calls the nixpkg so they should always be on the same version.

Would it not be possible for ctp/nix to fall behind nixpkgs? Do we have something automated to bump nixpkgs on ctp/nix when ctp/gtk releases a new version and it gets published to nixpkgs

isabelroses commented 6 months ago

catppuccin/nix has no inputs. it only provides outputs, in form of modules. So it uses the users inputs for the package.

nullishamy commented 6 months ago

Ah, I see. So the only case where there'd be an issue is if we changed the nixpkgs API for our package (which would break everything)? Seems fine to merge it into just "Nix", then?

isabelroses commented 6 months ago

Exactly.