Feature/particle refactor

[kks32]

Describe the PR Refactor particle class to handle multiple particle properties. Remove the particle base class. Add implementation for handling particle scalar properties.

Related Issues/PRs This is a work in progress implementation of #637

Additional context Still to resolve

• The ideal way to handle particle MPI transfer
• Process of handling HDF5 Particle struct

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Merging #650 into develop will increase coverage by 0.11%. The diff coverage is 91.50%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #650      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    96.56%   96.67%   +0.11%     
===========================================
  Files          122      120       -2     
  Lines        25247    25236      -11     
===========================================
+ Hits         24378    24395      +17     
+ Misses         869      841      -28     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
include/materials/bingham.h	100.00% <ø> (ø)
include/materials/bingham.tcc	98.18% <ø> (ø)
include/materials/linear_elastic.h	100.00% <ø> (ø)
include/materials/linear_elastic.tcc	100.00% <ø> (ø)
include/materials/material.h	100.00% <ø> (ø)
include/materials/modified_cam_clay.h	100.00% <ø> (ø)
include/materials/modified_cam_clay.tcc	89.14% <ø> (ø)
include/materials/mohr_coulomb.h	100.00% <ø> (ø)
include/materials/mohr_coulomb.tcc	99.29% <ø> (ø)
include/materials/newtonian.h	100.00% <ø> (ø)
... and 23 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data Powered by Codecov. Last update 7d4fe75...b00642f. Read the comment docs.

[kks32]

@tianchiTJ maybe namespace mpm::Particle::TwoPhase

[tianchiTJ]

@tianchiTJ maybe namespace mpm::Particle::TwoPhase

Sure, and for some general function like initialize_particle. Shall we create a new function like initialize_twophase_particle or other way? If use new function initialize_twophase_particle, is it only use to define variables for fluid phase and still need to use the original initialize_particle to define variables for solid phase, or include all defination?

[kks32]

I'll close this issue/branch as #654 supersedes this and is probably a better design. Please raise any objections you may have. I'll delete this branch after our weekly meeting.