But ln has the usage of ln [OPTION]... [-T] TARGET LINK_NAME, meaning in my example, the target should be pjdfstest_62de3fe7ed85982892794ca829c1eb8c and link name should be test, i.e., test -> pjdfstest_62de3fe7ed85982892794ca829c1eb8c if lsed. The fuser interface gives my program parameters in reverse order. Maybe a change of parameter name in symlink interface is fine.
When I run
ln -s pjdfstest_62de3fe7ed85982892794ca829c1eb8c test
, I got the following debug log from fuser:But
ln
has the usage ofln [OPTION]... [-T] TARGET LINK_NAME
, meaning in my example, the target should bepjdfstest_62de3fe7ed85982892794ca829c1eb8c
and link name should betest
, i.e.,test -> pjdfstest_62de3fe7ed85982892794ca829c1eb8c
ifls
ed. The fuser interface gives my program parameters in reverse order. Maybe a change of parameter name insymlink
interface is fine.