Closed balarsen closed 9 years ago
Yes, me too, the second sounds better.
ok, I've come back to life. Number 2. I've actually been musing the idea of a scientific programming toolkit. (This is in the vein of my ideas to create a flexible cfd library suite and so on.) Anyway, I see the common library as the first step in the toolkit. I guess I'm just trying to say the name makes sense.
OK I think we agreed on #2, I chnaged it in the readme. See 3ed7d4d368fef728b286715a0e7b7e28dad24d32
Common Science Programming Library or Common Scientific Programming Library
I vote #2.