Ensure any errata against RFCs that are being obsoleted or updated have been considered, and that the I-D clearly identifies those that have been addressed.
[x] https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6278 was about the role of the DELETE character, 0x7F. It's still allowed in BCHAR in the update -- are we still good at "the proper fix is not straightforward, and that it should be handled in the next version of the spec.", and why is this not the document to fix this in?
(AIU this doesn't need to be stated in the document; an acknowledgement that we still don't know how to best address this in here suffices to me.)
From the check list: