search

cburgmer / json-path-comparison

Comparison of the different implementations of JSONPath and language agnostic test suite.
https://cburgmer.github.io/json-path-comparison/
GNU General Public License v3.0
83 stars 26 forks source link

Clarify relationship to jsonpath-standard #78

Open cburgmer opened 3 years ago

cburgmer commented 3 years ago

Hey, I've lost a bit track of the developments over at https://github.com/jsonpath-standard. However, I understand that while Proposal A was a good start for a discussion, we have since moved on and it has become obsolete. So have all the open issues here related to that. At the same time there is now a growing reference implementation.

Would the right thing be to replace Proposal A under https://cburgmer.github.io/json-path-comparison/ with the reference implementation? @glyn

I'm happy for the comparison project to continue to document all the implementations out there, and would then change the roadmap accordingly!

glyn commented 3 years ago

Would the right thing be to replace Proposal A under https://cburgmer.github.io/json-path-comparison/ with the reference implementation? @glyn

Please note the reference implementation has a long way to go yet, although I don't mind it being added to show up the (rather large) gap. It might therefore be more reasonable to add the reference implementation alongside Proposal A for comparison.

Also, I guess other reference implementations might come along and need adding too. This depends on the IETF JSONPath Working Group's attitude to, and adoption of, one or more reference implementations.

cburgmer commented 3 years ago

Added the reference implementation to the table, but now running into https://github.com/mkmik/slyce/issues/17 under Ubuntu.