This PR is a fast follow on https://github.com/ccao-data/data-architecture/pull/351 to make the meta.description attributes easier to read for tests in the qc and dweldat models, as well as a few related tests on the comdat, and oby models. The more opaque fields on these models now include a hint indicating the iasWorld name of the field in the meta.description attribute, which gets templated into the dbt test failure workbook. This should make it a little bit easier for workbook users to act on problems in iasWorld when they are reported in the failure workbook.
Note that there were a few columns that I wanted to annotate with iasWorld fieldnames, but which I was unable to find in iasworld:
dweldat.user4
asmt.val14
asmt.val15
asmt.val56
asmt.val59
Let me know if you have any insight into the meaning of these columns, and otherwise I'll just leave the raw column name alone in meta.description.
This PR is a fast follow on https://github.com/ccao-data/data-architecture/pull/351 to make the
meta.description
attributes easier to read for tests in theqc
anddweldat
models, as well as a few related tests on thecomdat
, andoby
models. The more opaque fields on these models now include a hint indicating the iasWorld name of the field in themeta.description
attribute, which gets templated into the dbt test failure workbook. This should make it a little bit easier for workbook users to act on problems in iasWorld when they are reported in the failure workbook.Note that there were a few columns that I wanted to annotate with iasWorld fieldnames, but which I was unable to find in iasworld:
dweldat.user4
asmt.val14
asmt.val15
asmt.val56
asmt.val59
Let me know if you have any insight into the meaning of these columns, and otherwise I'll just leave the raw column name alone in
meta.description
.Closes https://github.com/ccao-data/data-architecture/issues/354.