The Data team aggregates the Commercial Valuations per-township, per-property type excel worksheets, and publishes them as an Open Data asset. It's soon time to update it now that we have finished the City's 2024 first pass mailing.
Of note:
We've started to split-class some properties such that some KeyPINs have two rows. Let's be sure this is handled gracefully/clearly.
The current Open Data asset, in its pre-updated form, contains data from 3 revaluation cycles, one of which is the City's 2021 revaluation. The biggest confusion about this data is the interaction between geography and year; i.e., that we have to look across 3 years to get countywide data. How should we handle having two City revaluation cycles? It's probably best to add to the current data asset and clarify the instructions, but open to other ideas, such as creating a new asset because the data model has changed slightly (per the above).
Goal:
The Data team aggregates the Commercial Valuations per-township, per-property type excel worksheets, and publishes them as an Open Data asset. It's soon time to update it now that we have finished the City's 2024 first pass mailing.
Of note: