Open ed-umb opened 3 months ago
Thank you. It appears that in the backend it hasn't registered any contracts for this module. Will investigate.
Can you point me to the tx hash that initializes a contract on this module?
Hello.
This is the tx hash: 0a1141dd7a65e77e1c84507d87657d9f6ebefa7195315f9c65acff5f5774017a
Hello. This is the tx hash:
0a1141dd7a65e77e1c84507d87657d9f6ebefa7195315f9c65acff5f5774017a
This is a tx from a different module?
In either case, I've added some logic to prevent this internal server error from happening. Now it shows for module 170e8b0869ba6cf1f1541d9214af65b1a8aa40c6e73dde3f35e99b8c6c6590f4
that are no results found, as is the case as this particular module does not have any instances created?
Excuse me, I''m new to Concordium so a bit lost here.
This is the smart contract (instance I believe): 9459, 0
And I also understand the module of the instance was updated with this transaction
CCDExplorer tracks instances on its original module. The module that you mentioned doesn't have any instances.
If you want to see Umbrella activity, I think you need to select the staking banks
modules?
Do you mean that in this case that the module has been update for the umbrella_feeds instance, it can't be tracked using CCDExplorer? Activity to track is definitely in the umbrella_feeds contract. And there are transactions executed by it..
You should definitely be able to track these modules and instances. Let me check once more tomorrow.
Excuse me, I''m new to Concordium so a bit lost here.
This is the smart contract (instance I believe): 9459, 0
And I also understand the module of the instance was updated with this transaction
This contract (9549) is instantiated from module efc4ea2b19330518131b67b0b66ac6f628438bfd740d694fcf64a13412bf327b
. If you were to search for this module on the reporting page, you will get back results?
In CCDExplorer I'm able to see the instance associated to the aforementioned module
But when comparing the data with CCDScan, I can see the instance was delinked from the module
If I select the smart contract related to the original module in CCDExplorer, it does display data:
BTW... Is this the info I get from the smart contract? I was looking for a detailed transaction report.
This page shows (on the txs tab) all txs for this contract. If this is not sufficient, can you detail what you are expecting?
I need to obtain a report of all the transactions executed during a defined period of time (eg: June),. The data I need is the date of teh tx (in the page you provided appears teh age), the block of the tx, function name, sender and tx costs.
Almost all data required is there in the page you shared, but the format makes it difficult to copy and paste it as a report. Additionally to the fact that I need many transactions, so doing it manually will be tedious and error-prone.
Do you know if something like thsi exists for Concordium?.
I think you would be best served by using the api. This is an endpoint to get tx information you need. I would need to build an endpoint to get tx hashes for a contract. Those two together would get you what you need, right?
Hi. I checked the api documentation and one thing I'm not sure is how to get all the transactions for a particular smart contract withing a range of blocks or time. Should I scan all the blocks to identify transactions?
I was hoping to have that information in a predefined report, but as per our conversation, this report is not yet in place, correct?
Correct. As I stated in the previous comment, I need to build this before it becomes available, but only building if it has actual use.
Describe the bug When trying to obtain a report for module
170e8b0869ba6cf1f1541d9214af65b1a8aa40c6e73dde3f35e99b8c6c6590f4
, I'm getting a "Server Internal Error" message,.To Reproduce Pre-requisites:
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
170e | umbrella_feeds
1M
as Reporting Period.Generate Report
buttonInternal Server Error
gets displayedExpected behavior A report is obtained with the transaction of the module for the last month.
Screenshots
Additional context I need to obtain a transaction report for the contract and I'm exploring whether the data included in the report generated by the CCDExplorer is what I need.