Closed olifre closed 4 years ago
@olifre
can you send a PR to fix this?
@xiang90 In principle yes, but there are two problems:
closing this since no PR. The name indicates the meaning: https://github.com/ccding/go-stun/blob/master/stun/const.go#L62
@ccding I could of course do a PR on this, but I'd love feedback first if an alias should be kept and if there's general agreement on a new name.
The current name seems irritating even though the description is clear. Since the broken name NATSymmetricUDPFirewall
has already lead to confusion in Syncthing (which did consider this a NAT, but it's completely unrelated), I don't think it's good to keep that.
@olifre Can you have a look at #34 ?
It took me a while to understand that
NATSymmetricUDPFirewall
actually meansSymmetric UDP Firewall
without any actual NAT being involved (as is also shown in the RFC and the flow chart in https://github.com/ccding/go-stun/blob/master/stun/discover.go ).I wonder whether this constant should be renamed / aliased to
SymmetricUDPFirewall
to better clarify that this is very different fromNATSymmetric
?