In the lists of relatives the MT appears with ”zz” if the MT cannot be determined according to our rules, and that is ok logically. As a corollary, however, all witnesses with lacuna at the respective passage are assigned to “zz(MT)”, although, of course, it is not the majority of witnesses that has a lacuna. Therefore, “(MT)” has to be suppressed where LABEZ LIKE 'zz'.
In the lists of relatives the MT appears with ”zz” if the MT cannot be determined according to our rules, and that is ok logically. As a corollary, however, all witnesses with lacuna at the respective passage are assigned to “zz(MT)”, although, of course, it is not the majority of witnesses that has a lacuna. Therefore, “(MT)” has to be suppressed where
LABEZ
LIKE 'zz'.