Closed jianshuod closed 2 weeks ago
Thanks for your kind suggestion. While adding more ranking standards may be more convenient for users, the presence of multiple standards like Tsinghua, CORE, etc., serves to increase the maintenance cost.
A deeper consideration is that if different ranking standards are adopted, many other conferences will be included, which diverges from the original intention of the repo.
To provide a fallback option in the future, we consider adding a feature to maintain the mapping between CCF and other ranking standards, while the main focus remains the CCF Recommendations.
Just an idea: maybe the union of several lists can help us estimate the workload of multiple-list-supporting feature.
More ranking standards have been added in [#539].
Some universities, like Tsinghua, maintain a different ranking standard for the international conference from CCF. Is there the possibility of supporting other ranking standards? It will make it more convenient. Or maybe we can fork a new branch, but updating the newest conference ddls seems challenging