Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Set to low (All the 'Legacy' are reminders of things that might be removed)
Original comment by yrizoud
on 7 Oct 2008 at 10:09
I plan to add some modes with rectangles pixels for Amstrad CPC graphists. this
computers has strange screenmodes with 2:1 or 1:2 aspect ratio. Don't know if
this
option will be usefull, but it may be handy to have it around ...
The idea is to have a X and a Y zoom factor for the picture even in non-zoomed
mode.
Some people also requested to have a zoom like that for LCD that can't stretch
the
picture.
Original comment by pulkoma...@gmail.com
on 7 Oct 2008 at 11:26
Original comment by pulkoma...@gmail.com
on 7 Oct 2008 at 2:54
[deleted comment]
Original comment by pulkoma...@gmail.com
on 24 Dec 2008 at 4:15
Original comment by pulkoma...@gmail.com
on 14 Jan 2009 at 4:44
[deleted comment]
[deleted comment]
This setting could be used to scale the window up when loading a picture.
Original comment by pulkoma...@gmail.com
on 23 Feb 2009 at 6:10
I agree that this feature is of very limited usability (since you can always
just
change the resolution yourself). But you can still use any resolution you want
even
on a modern computer (at least if it's running Linux and you have a working
driver).
And if all the resolutions you use have the same frequency you smoothly and
instantly
change between them without flicker (which hasn't always been possible). So this
feature is at least as useful now as it has ever been.
Here is how you use 320x400 at, let's say, 80Hz in X (XFree86 or Xorg on any
platform). Add the following line to the monitor section:
Modeline "320x400" 14.83 320 352 408 440 400 407 413 421
And to test it without restarting X you can run:
xinit /path/to/grafx2 -- /usr/bin/X :1
In fact this resolution will work better than 320x200 in most cases since some
newer
graphic interfaces can't do doublescan (draw each line twice to avoid so called
scanlines) and using it without doublescan will either result in a horizontal
sync
frequency too low or a refresh rate too high for most monitors to handle (as
well as
scanlines of course).
Original comment by magnu...@algonet.se
on 1 Mar 2009 at 11:11
Original comment by pulkoma...@gmail.com
on 26 May 2009 at 7:48
[deleted comment]
Original comment by pulkoma...@gmail.com
on 15 Sep 2009 at 7:13
Original comment by pulkoma...@gmail.com
on 15 Jan 2010 at 7:34
Original comment by pulkoma...@gmail.com
on 10 Apr 2011 at 8:43
Arbitering issues that make it to v2.4
Original comment by yrizoud
on 8 Mar 2012 at 7:18
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
yrizoud
on 7 Oct 2008 at 9:55