Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Winetricks installs apps into their own bottles by default now.
If you want the old behavior, use the --noisolate option.
Original comment by daniel.r...@gmail.com
on 29 Mar 2011 at 12:53
A few more points I should mention:
The new behavior was explicitly requested by Vitaliy on wine-devel, see
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2011-January/088332.html
For dlls, settings, and fonts, winetricks defaults to the old behavior,
since putting a dll in its own bottle doesn't make any sense.
Also, if you want to put a dll (say, flash) in an existing bottle (say,
firefox),
you can either do winetricks prefix=firefox flash, or
WINEPREFIX=$HOME/.local/share/winetricks/firefox winetricks flash.
Original comment by daniel.r...@gmail.com
on 29 Mar 2011 at 1:10
Dan,
I think it would be a good thing if we can just have
the old behavior, at least for people who know what they are doing. How about a
command line option?
Thanks,
-- todd --
Original comment by ToddM...@gmail.com
on 29 Mar 2011 at 1:27
Oh I see. You can use --noisolate, but only to install things on the command
line.
As soon as you use menus, it installs into individual bottles.
Original comment by ToddM...@gmail.com
on 29 Mar 2011 at 1:29
Yeah, that was per Vitaliy's request to guide inexperienced users firmly
towards isolating apps in bottles. It does mean people who know what they're
doing have to know a little more now, which is unfortunate, but it was the only
way to prevent a flood of spurious wine problem reports.
Original comment by daniel.r...@gmail.com
on 29 Mar 2011 at 1:32
I grok. Since I compile and run the git version of wine daily,
I guess I know what category I fit into.
Original comment by ToddM...@gmail.com
on 29 Mar 2011 at 1:36
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ToddM...@gmail.com
on 29 Mar 2011 at 12:37