Closed jeanpaulrsoucy closed 9 months ago
Adding a +1 to this comment, although there are major questions about how to standardize this data - thinking about / reckoning with this at SeroTracker
For sure. Great work being done by Doug Manuel & team on the Public Health Environmental Surveillance Open Data Model, which I suspect feeds into the data presented on the PHAC dashboard.
We may be able to add to the data available directly from PHAC by scraping the data found at the individual PHU/municipality/organization dashboards linked at the bottom of the page.
What should be the value name for wastewater? Should we specify units (e.g., wastewater_copies_ml
or wastewater_cp_ml
) or use something more general (wastewater_viral_load
). Regardless of the name, we will have to use a standard unit. Viral copies per mL (cp/mL) seems to be the way to go, per the [PHES-ODM](https://github.com/Big-Life-Lab/PHES-ODM).
I checked a handful of the other dashboards linked on the PHAC page, and these are the units they used:
So it seems reasonable to report a single value for wastewater_copies_per_ml
or similar name. Perhaps additional details (e.g., normalized, average, N1 or N2) could eventually be reported using a grouping variable. Wastewater data using alternative units, on the other hand, probably merits a separate value.
There are also options to report more specific values like N1 or N2 copies, but perhaps this would go in the future "grouping variable" category.
The current adaptation of the PHAC wastewater dataset will continue to be maintained, but there is no capacity to add additional wastewater datasets at this time.
Wastewater data are now available from PHAC for 6 jurisdictions: Wastewater surveillance dashboard