ccomeaux
commented
5 years ago Actually, before BGG supported a range, they just had one number. That's the number used when sorting. I think we can add sorting by the min or max without too much trouble.
Open aglenn opened 5 years ago
ccomeaux
commented
5 years ago Actually, before BGG supported a range, they just had one number. That's the number used when sorting. I think we can add sorting by the min or max without too much trouble.
aglenn
commented
4 years ago @ccomeaux I finally got fed up (Glass Road does not take 80 mins to solo, and that shouldn't irritate me as much as it does) and pulled down the repo to look at implementing this.
Since sorting in both directions on both sides of the range is 4 options, do you envision 4 new radio buttons added to the list, or a new input type? If you'd keep it radio options, should we axe the original play time sort?
When sorting on the collection page by play time (increasing or decreasing) the value used is always the max time (e.g. a 15-30 minute game is always sorted as 30 minutes). Giving the option on which to use (or even adding an "average time") would be helpful since many factors (player count, experience, mode selected) can contribute to which of those numbers matters.