Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Agreed. Thanks for the report.
Original comment by gak@google.com
on 11 Apr 2013 at 11:18
Please confirm our fix is to fix the documentation :-)
(It was a misfeature.)
Original comment by kevinb@google.com
on 13 Apr 2013 at 6:51
The feature sounds cool... but it turns out I didn't need it for my case... and
on reflection, since values need to be able to be parsed from string command
line arguments, there really isn't any downside to specifying them as strings
in the @Param decoration.
So yeah, fix should be to correct the documentation!
Original comment by mzero@google.com
on 15 Apr 2013 at 4:24
Confirmed.
Original comment by gak@google.com
on 15 Apr 2013 at 5:22
Original comment by gak@google.com
on 24 Apr 2013 at 12:21
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
mzero@google.com
on 5 Apr 2013 at 8:14