ccsb-scripps / AutoDock-Vina

AutoDock Vina
http://vina.scripps.edu
Apache License 2.0
617 stars 210 forks source link

Differences between `*_rigid.pdbqt` and `*.pdbqt` files of receptors #313

Closed eunos-1128 closed 6 months ago

eunos-1128 commented 6 months ago

Hi,

I prepared *_rigid.pdbqt and _*_flex.pdbqt files using prepare_flexreceptor.py for flexible docking with vina scoring function.

Beforehand, I executed ordinary dockings (only receptors rigid) and on that time I prepared usual *.pdbqt files of receptors using the ADFRsuite script.

I'm not sure of differences between usual *.pdbqt and *_rigid.pdbqt files.

Can I use *.pdbqt files for flexible docking instead of using *_rigid.pdbqt if they are regarded as actually same ones(because *.pdbqt files are supposed to be rigid)?

if *_rigid.pdbqt files have differences from *.pdbqt ones, I'd like to know what is different from.

Regards,

rwxayheee commented 6 months ago

hi @eunos-1128 The two files are different. The PDBQT with “rigid” in its name doesn’t contain the sidechain of the modified residue. If you use a file comparison tool you can get a better look how they differ.

For grid map computing (autogrid) and for docking, it makes more sense to use the “rigid” PDBQT as the receptor. Doing this excludes the sidechain from being doubly counted in receptor and flexible residue (which is essentially part of the mobile “ligand” in flexible docking)

eunos-1128 commented 6 months ago

@rwxayheee

Thank you! I understand :)