Closed mickohanlon23 closed 1 year ago
@ssebast2, @gmmeadows can you update the L2 logic after we confirm what the errata is, if we do plan to implement the errata to this section?
@mickohanlon23 - I don't see any mention of testing at 18 and 30 months in the errata. Once we receive word that the errata is stable, we will delve into this.
Oops. Now I see it. It is r/t text in a Figure that is being updated. We used the narrative text to build out the logic b/c we found many of the figures inaccurate or glossing over required details. We'll have to review this more carefully when the article is published - which keeps getting pushed back more and more.
I will keep this open so that we can track the update more closely once the errata article is published.
@mickohanlon23 - I updated the L2. This was a translation misinterpretation of the guidelines by Rose and I; not an update to the guidelines.
Email from Sharon:
This was a translation error on the parts of Rose and I (as opposed to an error in the narrative text of the 2019 guidelines). Side note – there was an error in Figure 7 of the 2019 guidelines that pictured requiring a total of 4 tests. Perhaps that is what swayed us to interpret the narrative guidelines as we did.
Management Surveillance (J.3.1) The recommendation and logic will need to be updated to include the Errata regarding HPV-based testing at 18 and 30 months.