Closed ndevenish closed 2 months ago
This made constructing the dxtbx format registry contingent on dials being present; a circular dependency. Switch to scitbx.array_family.flex instead.
This only occured when running full regression tests with dxtbx and dials_regression, which is probably why it wasn't noticed before.
Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
0%
1 lines
Project coverage is 42.22%. Comparing base (61b5a40) to head (8c00e9f).
61b5a40
8c00e9f
This made constructing the dxtbx format registry contingent on dials being present; a circular dependency. Switch to scitbx.array_family.flex instead.
This only occured when running full regression tests with dxtbx and dials_regression, which is probably why it wasn't noticed before.