search

ccwalletio / tracker

An issue tracker for ccwallet.io feature requests
25 stars 2 forks source link

Metadata not shown on fungible token after minting #149

Open frozenproof opened 1 year ago

frozenproof commented 1 year ago

I have checked throughly , and here the pictures proofs

image (1) image (2) image

For some reasons , when i minted fungible token on meshjs , it doesnt show up properly on eternl.io wallet. But just a month ago , with the same data and tool , it showed up properly . eternl.io does regconize its fungible token . non fungible token show up properly on eternl.io with same tool.

Scitz0 commented 1 year ago

Hi, could you please try the refresh button top left corner of the metadata modal?

frozenproof commented 1 year ago

Hi, could you please try the refresh button top left corner of the metadata modal?

Sir , I was very busy , but as you can see , it has been 2 weeks already , and the data never updates. ![Uploading image_2023-04-07_114122605.png…]()

Here is the link to the asset on the preprod scan: https://preprod.cardanoscan.io/token/asset1ezhyww3n6lm28t3wdtql652w4xfjrlunrm9s3j

Its definitely on the preprod scan , but it just doesnt show up on Eternl.io wallet.

frozenproof commented 1 year ago

Hi, could you please try the refresh button top left corner of the metadata modal?

Sir , I was very busy , but as you can see , it has been 2 weeks already , and the data never updates. ![Uploading image_2023-04-07_114122605.png…]()

Scitz0 commented 1 year ago

I had a look at the metadata now and I haven't heard of format using label 20 before. It seems to use same structure as 721. So a quick fix would be to use that instead. But I will look into this and see if there is an CIP that describes metadata with label 20.

Scitz0 commented 1 year ago

I had a chat with Mesh team and now understand that label 20 metadata is something that was proposed a couple of years ago but has yet to be approved as a standard. Its currently unclear if we will support this or not.

The currently approved method is to use CIP-721 metadata together with offline github token registry(CF for mainnet and IOG for testnets) for FT data like decimals etc. But we will discuess internally of potentially support it in a future release.

frozenproof commented 1 year ago

I see . Thank you for your help . We will find a way to work around for now . As of now , which label should we set for native tokens so that they show up properly ?

I had a chat with Mesh team and now understand that label 20 metadata is something that was proposed a couple of years ago but has yet to be approved as a standard. Its currently unclear if we will support this or not.

The currently approved method is to use CIP-721 metadata together with offline github token registry(CF for mainnet and IOG for testnets) for FT data like decimals etc. But we will discuess internally of potentially support it in a future release.

Scitz0 commented 1 year ago

I think we will add 20 metadata support soon so you could do both that and register your token in the offline token registry.

frozenproof commented 1 year ago

I see , thanks a lot for your help !