search

cda-tum / mqt-bench

MQT Bench - A MQT tool for Benchmarking Quantum Software Tools
https://www.cda.cit.tum.de/mqtbench/
MIT License
68 stars 12 forks source link

✨ improve CI/CD and package itself #322

Closed nquetschlich closed 2 months ago

nquetschlich commented 2 months ago

This PR

github-advanced-security[bot] commented 2 months ago

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

codecov[bot] commented 2 months ago

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 83.33333% with 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 93.0%. Comparing base (0aaca11) to head (aa0d884).

Files Patch % Lines
src/mqt/bench/benchmark_generator.py 0.0% 1 Missing :warning:
src/mqt/bench/utils.py 66.6% 1 Missing :warning:
src/mqt/bench/viewer/main.py 66.6% 1 Missing :warning:
Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #322 +/- ## ======================================= + Coverage 91.8% 93.0% +1.1% ======================================= Files 47 47 Lines 2441 2437 -4 ======================================= + Hits 2243 2268 +25 + Misses 198 169 -29 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/cda-tum/mqt-bench/pull/322/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=cda-tum) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [python](https://app.codecov.io/gh/cda-tum/mqt-bench/pull/322/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=cda-tum) | `93.0% <83.3%> (?)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=cda-tum#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.