MQT Predictor - A MQT tool for Automatic Device Selection with Device-Specific Circuit Compilation for Quantum Computing
58
stars
13
forks
source link
🧱 switched from mqt-core to mqt-workflows for CI workflows #230
Closed
nquetschlich closed 2 months ago
Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #230 +/- ## ===================================== Coverage 79.7% 79.7% ===================================== Files 12 12 Lines 967 967 ===================================== Hits 771 771 Misses 196 196 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/cda-tum/mqt-predictor/pull/230/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=cda-tum) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [python](https://app.codecov.io/gh/cda-tum/mqt-predictor/pull/230/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=cda-tum) | `79.7% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=cda-tum#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.