Update MQT Bench Dependency and MQT Predictor Paper Reference

[nquetschlich]

This PR

• updates to the latest MQT Bench version that introduces two new devices (which are not yet fully supported due to their native gates and required special handling) (see newly opened issue: https://github.com/cda-tum/mqt-predictor/issues/244)
• updates the paper reference after the acceptance at TQC

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 79.7%. Comparing base (6f81633) to head (f72a612). Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #243 +/- ## ===================================== Coverage 79.7% 79.7% ===================================== Files 12 12 Lines 967 967 ===================================== Hits 771 771 Misses 196 196 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/cda-tum/mqt-predictor/pull/243/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=cda-tum) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [python](https://app.codecov.io/gh/cda-tum/mqt-predictor/pull/243/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=cda-tum) | `79.7% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=cda-tum#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.